Enhancing Sustainability Education in Maritime Cadet Training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/abdidas.v5i3.933Keywords:
Sustainability Education, Maritime Training, Cadets, Renewable Energy, Teaching MethodsAbstract
This research explores the integration of sustainability concepts into maritime training programs for cadets, focusing on curriculum content, teaching methods, and challenges. Through qualitative analysis, the study identifies a strong emphasis on renewable energy and practical exercises, with opportunities for improvement in energy efficiency and industry engagement. Challenges such as resource constraints and resistance to change are highlighted, underscoring the need for collaborative efforts to promote sustainability within maritime education. The findings emphasize the importance of enhancing curriculum content and teaching methods to prepare cadets for the environmental challenges facing the maritime industry. By addressing these challenges and fostering a culture of sustainability, stakeholders can play a vital role in shaping the future of the maritime sector. The research contributes to a better understanding of sustainability education in maritime training and provides insights to inform future initiatives aimed at fostering environmental stewardship among future maritime professionals.
Downloads
References
Agrifoglio, R., Cannavale, C., Laurenza, E., & Metallo, C. (2017). How emerging digital technologies affect operations management through co-creation. Empirical evidence from the maritime industry. Production Planning & Control, 28(16), 1298–1306.
Basu, D., Misra, A., & Puppala, A. J. (2015). Sustainability and geotechnical engineering: perspectives and review. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 52(1), 96–113.
Bee, M. (2017). A study into the professional identity of lecturers at a maritime education and training institute operating on the boundary of further and higher education. University of Southampton.
Bican, P. M., & Brem, A. (2020). Digital business model, digital transformation, digital entrepreneurship: Is there a sustainable “digital”? Sustainability, 12(13), 5239.
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815.
Cicek, K., Akyuz, E., & Celik, M. (2019). Future skills requirements analysis in maritime industry. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 270–274.
de la Peña Zarzuelo, I., Soeane, M. J. F., & Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100173.
Ferritto, V. R. (2016). Maritime education factors and presenteeism: a comparative quantitative study. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15, 353–380.
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Sablynski, C. J. (1999). Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 161–187.
Mallam, S. C., Nazir, S., & Renganayagalu, S. K. (2019). Rethinking maritime education, training, and operations in the digital era: Applications for emerging immersive technologies. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(12), 428.
Munim, Z. H., Dushenko, M., Jimenez, V. J., Shakil, M. H., & Imset, M. (2020). Big data and artificial intelligence in the maritime industry: a bibliometric review and future research directions. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(5), 577–597.
Padgett, D. K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research (Vol. 36). Sage publications.
Saldana, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE publications.
Sartini, S. (2017). Maritime English teaching in the middle of seafarer’s issues and global maritime opportunity. UAD TEFL International Conference, 1, 471–475.
Sparrow, R., Dartanto, T., & Hartwig, R. (2020). Indonesia under the new normal: Challenges and the way ahead. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 56(3), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2020.1854079
Tong, Y., Kinshuk, & Wei, X. (2020). Teaching design and practice of a project-based blended learning model. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2020010103
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rosna Yuherlina Siahaan, April Gunawan Malau, Susi Herawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
